Classifying researchers according to the quality of their published work rather than the quantity
is a curtail issue. We attempt to introduce a new formula of the percentage range to be used for evaluating
qualitatively the researchers' production. The suggested equation depends on the number of the singleauthor published papers and their citations to be added as a new factor to the known h-index. These factors give an advantage and make a clear evidence of innovative authors and reduce the known h-index for authors who are gaining citations by adding their names to multi-author papers. It is shown that various
dimensions of ethical integrity and originality will be effective in this new index. An important scenario
arising from the analysis is shown in terms of examples. It refers to larger differences between the h- and
the newindex which comes from the whole work and the one comes from the single-author papers only, is
shown.