University …SOHAG Faculty MEDICINE Department ………
___________________________________________________
A- Basic Information
- Title and Code: ………..course. 1st part of Master course
- Programme(s) on which this course is given: Msc
- Year/ Level of programmes : 1st part.
- Units/Credit hours:
|
Lectures |
Practical/ surgical |
Clinical/ Tutorial |
Total |
hours /week |
2 |
6
|
----- |
8 |
Total |
30 |
90 |
|
120 |
- Names of lecturers contributing to the delivery of the course
- Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny
Course co-ordinator Dr: Medhat Ibrahim
External evaluator Dr. Yousef Badran
B- Statistical Information
No. of students attending the course: No 2 100%
No. of students completing the course: No. 2 100%
Results:
Passed: No. 2( 100%) Failed: No. 0 (0) %
Grading of successful students:
Excellent: No. 0 (0%) % Very Good: No.2 (100%)
Good : No. 0 (0 %) Pass: No. 0 (0%)
C- Professional Information
1 – Course Teaching
Topic |
No. of hours |
Lecture |
-Background Radiation. -Structure of matter. -Nuclear Transformation. -X- Ray Tube & Production. -Intensifying Screens. -Radiographic Film. -Radiographic Quality. -The Grid. -Special X ray equipments. -Beam Restricting Devices. -MRI. -CT. -Ultrasonography. -Detection of Radiation. -Radio-Production.
|
|
Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny Prof: DR.Nader El sherbiny
|
Total |
|
|
Topics taught as a percentage of the content specified:
100 % Ö 70-90 % <70%
Reasons in detail for not teaching any topic
2- Teaching and Learning Methods:
Lectures:
Practical Training/ Laboratory:
Seminar/Workshop:
Class Activity:
Case Study:
Other Assignments/Homework:
Teaching skills in the casualty department , out-patient clinic and skill’s lab on communication with patients, history taking doing vaginal examination for normal and abnormal cases, IUCD insertion and removal, episiotomy and its repair, computer skills and computer based learning.
3- Student Assessment:
Method of Assessment Percentage of total
Written examination 50%
Oral examination 30%
Practical/laboratory work 20%
Other Assignments/class work formative
Total 100 %
Members of Examination Committee
No examination was done
Role of external evaluator
The external evaluator was involved in revising the course specifications and the curriculum as regards its contents, methods of implementation and techniques of evaluation for each part.
4- Facilities and Teaching Materials:
Totally adequate
Adequate to some extent
Inadequate
List any inadequacies:-
- The Out patient clinics are not adequate for practical training.
- The number of clinical representatives is inadequate.
5- Administrative Constraints
Although there is marked cooperation at the higher authority levels as regards making teaching facilities available, yet there is some shortage in the form of the number of clinical cases due the renovation of the hospitals infrastructures.
6- Student Evaluation of the course: A questionnaire was filled by the students at the end of the course and before attending the final examination, the student's criticism was:-
*Absence of a dependable source for studying.
* Absence of development of a good Rapport with their staff members.
* Difference in opinion between their staff members.
Response of Course Team: The course team discussed the points of criticism, the points of strength and the points of weakness in the students evaluation and this will be reflected on the action plan for the new academic year.
7- Comments from external evaluator(s):
The external evaluator feels that the contents of the course are adequate and covers the objective of the course core curriculum adequately.
The external evaluator had a look on the final examination and appreciated the wide area of the curriculum covered by this examination.
The external evaluator appreciated the effort of collecting the materials included in the lectures through the whole course as an electronic and written document
Response of Course Team:
The course team very respectfully appreciated the comments of the external evaluator.
.
8- Action Plan for Academic Year 2012 – 2013
Actions Required |
Person Responsible |
Completion Date |
Department web site on which all lectures and teaching materials will be available for the students |
Head of the department |
mid-year 2013 |
Construction of institutional E-mails of the staff and their availability to the students |
Quality assurance unite |
mid-year 2013 |
Development of question bank |
Head of the department |
October 2012 |
A system for computer based examination |
Head of the department |
October 2012 |
Course Coordinator: Dr: Medhat Ibrahim
Signature:
Date: